Friday, September 30, 2011
Ben Goldacre: Battling Bad Science
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Job opening for Research Assistant
Research Assistant
Health Promotion Research
The Department of Surgery of the University of Vermont is seeking a highly motivated
and energetic individual to support a research program in cancer epidemiology. This
program, directed by Dr. Brian Sprague, conducts research on trends in cancer incidence
and survival, risk factors for developing cancer, optimal screening practices to detect
cancer, and factors that influence survival after a cancer diagnosis. Areas of ongoing
research includes investigations of the impacts of environmental chemicals on breast
cancer risk, the influence of physical activity on survival after a cancer diagnosis, the role
of vitamin D in cancer prevention, quality of life in cancer survivors, and mathematical
modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of new breast cancer screening and diagnostic
practices. Approximately 20 hours per week with a salary range of $18,000 - 18,399.
DIVISION
College of Medicine
LOCATION
Burlington, Vermont
DESIRED CLASS LEVEL(S)
Alumni, Doctorate, GR
QUALIFICATIONS
Necessary Skills:
Bachelor’s degree in the health sciences, biological sciences, or biostatistics.
Experience performing searches of scientific literature, using databases such as PubMed
or Medline.
Quantitative analysis skills, particularly with experience in the use of MS Excel and
statistical software such as SAS.
Strong written communication skills, with the ability to summarize findings in written
reports including tables, graphs, and charts.
Desirable Skills:
Previous research experience in health sciences, biological sciences, or statistics.
Experience in performing multivariable regression statistical techniques.
Ability to work independently on research projects.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Ms. Dawn M Pelkey
Business Manager
Department of Surgery
1 S. Prospect St, Rm 4425
MS 429AR4
Burlington, Vermont 05401-3444
United States
Dawn.Pelkey@uvm.edu
(802) 656-4187
http://www.uvm.edu/~ohpr/
TED comes to UVM with big DATA, BIG stories
Registration
If you would like to attend this exciting event, please register now.
Event Schedule
Hilary Mason
Joshua Bongard: The Robot Revolution
Mike Schmidt
Gary Johnson: Modelling Ecosystem Services under Uncertainty with ARIES
Hugh Garavan: Addiction, the Frontal Lobes, and the Science of Willpower
Austin Troy: Seeing the Pattern for the Pixels: Extracting Meaning from Massive Spatial Data Sets
Marta González
Isabel Kloumann: Measuring Happiness the Big Data Way: In Language and Online
Neil Johnson: Beyond Black Swans: From Irregular Warfare to Subsecond Financial Crises
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Clinical Research Oriented Workshop (CROW) Meeting: Sept 22, 2011
Present: Kairn Kelley, Amanda Kennedy, Connie van Eeghen
1. Check in: We surveyed ourselves about where we would like these CROW notes to appear on the web. Our plan is to continue to post them on the CTS Blogspot and ask Jen to put a link to the Blogspot under the CTS website, under the Current Students tab. Amanda is a resource for website changes and questions.
2. Kairn: Update on Academic Work
a. Kairn’s progress from 2008-2010 has met the program requirements; 2010-11 is noted as a “lost year.” To date, Kairn has 40 academic credits (3 in process, 32 left to go), has reframed but maintained the study question, cleaned data, completed an unstructured literature review, and built many helpful relationships. Still to be determined is whether the teaching requirement was met, TBD by Alan. This semester includes one course (NH302 “Quality in Health Care”) and the comprehensive exam in December (or January).
b. At last update with Ben, ready to produce an outline for the dissertation study. Still to do:
i. Set up Dissertation Committee: Ben; Liz Chen; Donna Rizzo (complex systems), acting as outside chair; Betsy Hoza (psychology)
1. Donna Rizzo can support looking at complex systems tools; Betsy Hoza can support looking at dichotic words testing in kids with ADHD
2. Critical success factor: do not let the committee distract you. Bring an outline of exactly what you want from the committee: plan, discussion, and outcomes.
ii. Develop a research plan that builds on a promising relationship and strengthens appropriate skills. However, each relationship must support the end goal of completing the dissertation.
1. Clinically based research
2. Informatics
iii. Develop an education plan: bioinformatics practicum, neuro-course
c. What is the Critical Path? Somewhat based on financial support. A fellowship adds another year to the process (at least), but with the data collected in 2008 there is a reason for moving forward expeditiously.
i. Academic: confirm academic credits with the Graduate College via Jen
1. Completed 12/20 research credits
2. Completed all core courses
3. Other courses to consider as electives in the future: neuroanatomy; practicum with Liz (based on committee advice)
4. Need 8 research credits and another 24 credits (course or research); go heavy on the research
5. At a rate of 6 credits/semester: ~5 semesters – could be completed by 2013
6. Decision made: Graduation date will be in December 2013
ii. Comps Committee – plan for first meeting by end of Oct/early Nov. Need three members (not Ben or Amanda). Will request: Charlie, Peter, Rycki. Amanda to contact all three today. Plan to go to the first meeting with the comps question. (It must be distinct enough from your dissertation to be considered a different research topic. Use FINER criteria.)
iii. Dissertation Committee – approve dissertation question by 12/15/11. Schedule the first committee meeting by Oct 15 (for a date by Dec 15). Kairn will send out the email by Sept 23.
1. Development of study question still to come; to be discussed at upcoming CROW session on Oct 13. Be specific; is it fine tuned enough to be published in an academic journal? (The requirement is to be able to produce one or more publishable articles.)
2. Plan for review article in 2012.
d. “The only good dissertation is a done dissertation.” Post this on the wall where you work!
3. Next Workshop Meeting(s): Thursday, 12:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m., at Given Courtyard Level 4
a. Sept 29: Rodger – ??? (Ben teaching “Cell to Society”) (Amanda late)
b. Oct 6: Connie – qualitative analysis (Ben out)
c. Oct 13: Kairn: study question (with one or more version already written out)
d. Oct 20: (no Amanda)
e. Future agenda to consider:
i. Ben: budgeting exercise for grant applications
ii. Rodger: Mixed methods article; article on Behavior’s Influence on Medical Conditions (unpublished)
iii. Future: Review of different types of journal articles (lit review, case study, original article, letter to editor…), when each is appropriate, tips on planning/writing (Abby)
Recorded by Connie van Eeghen; edited by Kairn Kelley
Friday, September 16, 2011
Research Commercialization Webinar Series
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Clinical Research Oriented Workshop (CROW) Meeting: Sept 8, 2011
Present: Kairn Kelley, Amanda Kennedy, Rodger Kessler
1. Kairn: Semester Plan
a. Kairn conducted an academic advising session, receiving helpful support and advice, such as "don't make things more complicated than they need to be" and "understand the requirements and check off the boxes." There was also some discussion about barriers to progress
2. Next Workshop Meeting(s): Thursday, 12:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m., at Given Courtyard Level 4
b. Sept 22: (Rodger out)
c. Sept 29: Rodger – ???
d. Future agenda to consider:
i. Ben: budgeting exercise for grant applications
ii. Rodger: Mixed methods article; article on Behavior’s Influence on Medical Conditions (unpublished)
Recorder: K. Kelley
Thursday, September 8, 2011
New Faculty Publication
Morris NS, Grant S, Repp A, MacLean C, Littenberg B. Prevalence of Limited Health Literacy and Compensatory Strategies Used by Hospitalized Patients. Nursing Research 2011; 60:361-6
Background: Limited health literacy is associated with higher rates of hospitalization. However, the prevalence and etiology of limited health literacy among hospitalized adults and the compensatory strategies used are not known.
Objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and demographic associations of limited health literacy in hospitalized patients and to identify the perceived etiology and use of any compensatory strategies.
Method: A cross-sectional study was implemented of a consecutive sample of hospitalized adults admitted to the Internal Medicine Hospitalist Service at a 440-bed academic medical center (n = 103) in Vermont. Health literacy was determined using the short form of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Demographic data, perceived etiology of difficulties in reading or understanding health information, and use of compensatory strategies were self-reported.
Results: Sixty percent of medical inpatients have limited health literacy. Thirty-six percent of patients with limited health literacy attribute this to difficulties with vision. Sixty-two percent of all medical inpatients rely on help from a health professional, and 23% look to a family member when faced with challenges in reading or understanding health information.
Discussion: The prevalence of limited health literacy is high in hospitalized medical patients. Further study of the timing and methods of communicating information to hospitalized patients is warranted. Assuring that the patient and/or family understand the postdischarge plans will be an important step to improving quality and safety.