Present: Abby Crocker, Kairn Kelley, Amanda Kennedy, Ben Littenberg, Connie van Eeghen
1. Start Up: Amanda had a great vacation and got her camera back from the taxi she left it in – hooray! Many stories about what we’ve left where, what happens, and what happens when it’s on purpose (i.e. as part of a study).
2. Presentation: Amanda gave an update on pharmacists integrated into primary care practices as part of a VDH-funded grant.
a. Plan: five sites, with a part time pharmacist in each one. The goal is to use existing pharmaceutical resources (health organizations, community), with the likelihood of assigning those resources to more than one practice (1:5). Sites were “cherry picked” to ensure 100% commitment. This was a rocky process, as the budget was set before the process was determined.
b. FAHC pharmacy leader today volunteered another .20 FTE to support a sixth practice. Monday, January 30, saw the kick-off meeting, attended by almost all physician leaders.
c. Current timeline: now interviewing pharmacists and selecting them for assignment. Steps to implement:
i. Pharmacist shadows physician, and understands practice flow
ii. Amanda negotiates what actions pharmacists will start with:
1. Education (answer questions from community, staff, CHIT…)
2. Direct patient care (pharmacists can bill for this)
a. Recommendations of Rx to doctor
b. Adjustment of meds based on a pre-set algorithm
c. Re-write Rx (true collaborative practice) – some details need to be worked out here, based on laws, systems, and practice
3. Consultation (see next item) – using the data system to identify patients who need a change in medication intervention.
d. Implications: the pharmacist is not seen as a care manager but as a consultant. One approach is to use the EHR to clean up the practice’s medication management. The pharmacist can look for patterns of medication management and for patients who need follow-up on out-dated or needed meds.
e. Future: one year to explore; in one year will need a sustainability plan. For now: how to integrate into the practice, negotiating with the practice providers/leaders. Amanda is budgeted at 20% of her time, which already appears too low.
i. April: start up with pharmacist, continue for a year
ii. July 2013: analyze data and determine level of success
f. Evaluation plan: mostly process measures. Not a clinical trial, this project is organized under the model of the Blueprint. The focus of the work will be determined by the practice. No one primary outcome; a ‘wacky’ project but very exciting.
i. Clinical measures: meds and changes made
1. Medication Management System is an example of a vendor that can support the pharmacists work, to be copied into the EHR
2. Web-based system might be financially viable, with limited access (not all pharmacists will use at the same time)
ii. Satisfaction: prescriber, staff, pharmacist, patient
iii. Cost: estimates of time spent by pharmacist, costs related to drug changes, diary study of providers to study efficiency
iv. Sustainability: proportion of time that the pharmacists could bill for
3. Workshop Goals for 2012:
a. Journal club: identify UVM guests and articles; invite to CROW ahead of time
b. Research updates: share work-in-process
4. Next Workshop Meeting(s): Thursday, 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m., at Given Courtyard Level 4.
a. Feb 9: Connie: oral presentation for defense (no Ben)
b. Feb 16: Abby: feedback from lit review – new edited version (no Connie)
c. Feb 23: Kairn: lit review update (no Amanda or Connie)
d. Mar 1: (no Connie, ? Kairn)
e. Mar 8: Early start, for those available, 11:00 – 2:00, Connie’s dissertation defense
f. Mar 15: (no Ben, Connie)
g. Future agenda to consider:
i. Ben: budgeting exercise for grant applications
ii. Rodger: Mixed methods article; article on Behavior’s Influence on Medical Conditions (unpublished); drug company funding. Also: discuss design for PCBH clinical and cost research.
iii. Amanda: presentation and interpretation of data in articles
iv. Sharon Henry: article by Cleland, Thoracic Spine Manipulation, Physical Therapy 2007
v. Future: Review of different types of journal articles (lit review, case study, original article, letter to editor…), when each is appropriate, tips on planning/writing (Abby)
Recorder: C. van Eeghen
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.