Present: Amanda
Kennedy, Charlie MacLean, Connie van Eeghen
1.
Start Up: Civilization
starts with a tea pot; see Alan Rubin for proof of this.
2.
Presentation: Connie
van Eeghen – Poster Presentation on Opiate Rx QI
a. Connie
shared her first draft of a poster presentation planned for the annual
conference of the Society of General Internal Medicine (end of April in
Denver). Although the number of workshop
participants was low this week, this had no effect on the number of suggestions
made to improve the poster, which were so substantial it is almost impossible
to capture them all. Some of the more
significant changes:
i.
Include references in small print in a corner of the
poster. This material draws from several
other researchers, some of whom will be attending the conference.
ii.
Add more data to the background.
iii.
Use the headers as the thread on which the future
article will be based – lead the reader through the study.
iv.
Integrate all text into the poster as text; don’t try
to make some of it behave like an illustration.
v.
Replace reports of the results with tables/charts.
vi.
Switch to 3 columns (from 4) to give wide diagrams the
space they need.
vii.
Link like items together: number the best practices and
reference the numbers in the table and diagram.
viii.
A table that shows what each practice did and didn’t
accomplish (traffic light indicators of red/yellow/green) is more compelling
that a simple bar chart that shows only which best practices were used most.
ix.
Include the funding source. And include the final poster in an appendix
to the final report for the funding source (VDH).
3.
Presentation:
Charlie MacLean – Poster Presentation on Pharmacoepidemiology
a. Charlie
was invited to participate in a FAHC quality improvement symposium, and asked
at the last minute to provide a poster.
The poster provides the rationale for why pharmacoepi-studies are
valuable and illustrates with two examples.
Suggestions made included eliminating a general illustration on the conceptual
relevance of pharmacoepi and exchanging report samples for report results.
4.
Plans for
VHCURES Project
a. Next
week we will start developing our VHCURES project, with the general goal of
studying:
i.
Opiate naïve patients
ii.
Natural history of opiate use
iii.
Progression of drug use
iv.
Progression of provider involvement (and order of
involvement)
v.
ED utilization
b. Our
goal for next week is to develop a research question. Additional steps after that include:
i.
IRB approval
ii.
Data clean-up for individual providers records
(Charlie)
iii.
Plan to triangulate data in PRISM or IRIS (validation
paper)
1. VHCURES:
the FAHC doctors and practices; the drugs that were paid for
2. PRISM:
the drugs that were ordered
3. VHCURES:
the unseen prescribers and drugs; time from ordering to fulfillment
c. Charlie
will lead the workshop next week.
a.
Mar 14: Charlie: Development of VCHURES Research
Question (everyone will be here!)
b.
Mar 21: Kairn: F31
c. Future
agenda to consider:
i.
Christina Cruz, 3rd year FM resident with
questionnaire for mild serotonin withdrawal syndrome?
ii.
Peter Callas or other faculty on multi-level modeling
iii.
Charlie MacLean: demonstration of Tableau
iv.
Journal article: Gomes, 2013, Opioid Dose and MVA in
Canada (Charlie)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.