Clinical Research Oriented Workshop (CROW) Meeting: May 10,
2018
Present:
Marianne Burke, Levi Bonnell, Juvena Hitt, Kairn Kelley, Ben Littenberg, Gail
Rose, Connie van Eeghen
Notes: Connie
Start Up: Two
sentence exercise:
“In a review
of the literature prior studies reported their findings that outcomes were
higher in men than women.”
In prior studies, outcomes were higher in men.
Or, prior studies reported higher outcomes in men.
Or, outcomes are higher in men.
Or, men had higher outcomes.
“In all
probability, the data is biased”
These data
may be biased.
Or, the data
are biased.
If you are having trouble hearing today, please ask us for a
listening device. (Reduced down from a much longer statement by Kairn with
Patient & Family Services)
1.
Android phone prevalence
a.
All Android users agreed to try out Gail’s
alcohol use app
b.
I-phones: more common or less common than
Androids
2.
Updates
a.
Marianne: conducting a mixed methods study on
why Visual Dx failed to change patient outcomes
i.
Created a model of possible reasons
ii.
11 providers interviewed in active group; 2 in
control
iii.
Is working with two independent coders (Alan and
Lilliane)
1.
Not a grounded theory process; a thematic
process
2.
Evidence-based evidence model
3.
Technology Acceptance Model
iv.
Next: re-reviewing transcripts, de-identifying,
and engaging in iterative reviews with coders (about 3 at a time)
1.
Transcripts range from very short to lengthy; on
average 1 hour each
Next workshop
meetings: Thursdays @ 11 AM. Given Courtyard South Level 4
·
May 17: Justine:
Review of manuscript
·
May 24:
Connie and Roger Kessler
·
May 31:
Adam Atherly & Eline Van Den Broek:
MEPS Data
·
June 7:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.