Present: Marianne Burke, Kairn Kelley, Ben Littenberg, Charlie
MacLean, Katie Peper, Adam Sprouse-Blum, Connie van Eeghen
Start Up: 10th Annual UVM
Student Research Conference on April 28, 2016
1.
Discussion: Marianne
and Katie’s proposed presentation to the Teaching Academy
a. Cure
rate is 39/116 (all better)
i.
Additional: 3/116
b. Mid-study
analysis: can the data be analyzed mid-study without introducing bias?
i.
Risk of reporting false positives because later periods
show reduced effect
ii.
May create an erroneous conclusion that is hard to
correct later
iii.
Low risk – good to proceed
c. Key
findings to highlight
i.
All practitioners use evidence-based resources at least
once/ month
ii.
Residents have a different pattern re: choice of
resources
iii.
Use charts to reinforce key findings
d. Conclusions:
educational, clinical, or policy implications for findings
i.
Clinical faculty do use EBP tools; there is a demand of
these tools
1. Therefore,
tools must be maintained
ii.
Faculty have different use than residents; one approach
is probably sub-optimal – why different?
Which is better?
iii.
Are there implications about the use of these resources
for skin conditions?
e. Katie
to present a different presentation at the Student Research Conference (above)
a.
March 24, 2016: Adam – feedback on his
migraine/gastrointestinal motility research (Stowe, VT; early April)
b.
March 31, 2016: Ben – NAPCRG proposal
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.