Present: Marianne Burke, Nancy Gell, Juvena Hitt, Rocky Kelley, Ben Littenberg, Jen Oshita, Gail Rose, Liliane Savard, Adam Sprouse-Blum, Connie van Eeghen (10)
1. Warm Up: PCORI’s support team for grant applicants is pretty good
2. Ben’s presentation to NAPCRG on IBH-PC results: what could be improved and how long did it take?
a. Timing: 12+ minutes; target is 10
b. Suggestions:
i. Less on “Table 1” information
1. Collapse to one graph (age) with bullets for other demographics
ii. Include the map of sites – everyone likes these
iii. Less on Subgroups-54 analyses: just the bolded statement, less methods explanation
iv. Keep Covid; consider turning into a graphic with timeline
v. Consider focusing on what was in the toolkit and why it didn’t work (ASB)
1. Use icons to identify components; see:
2. https://sites.google.com/view/ibhpc/home
vi. Rewording/reformatting of some bullets
vii. Enunciation is a good thing
viii. Consider “Integration Toolkit” instead of “Toolkit”
ix. Block out concepts and put on separate slides, e.g. Research Question, Toolkit and how disseminated
x. Remove slide on potential confounders, save for end of deck to use if needed
xi. Spend more time on post hoc and less time on primary outcome; shift from 70:30 to 60:40 or 50:50
c. Thanks to all!
3. Next week: Levi? He will be back next week
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.