NIH Proposal Scoring

Reviewers have been instructed to provide scores for each individual review criterion, and an overall impact/ priority score for each application. These scores are given in whole numbers on a 9-point rating scale according to the following descriptions and additional guidance:

Score	Descriptor	Additional Guidance on Strengths/Weaknesses
1	Exceptional	Exceptionally strong with essentially no weaknesses
2	Outstanding	Extremely strong with negligible weaknesses
3	Excellent	Very strong with only some minor weaknesses
4	Very Good	Strong but with numerous minor weaknesses
5	Good	Strong but with at least one moderate weakness
6	Satisfactory	Some strengths but also some moderate weaknesses
7	Fair	Some strengths but with at least one major weakness
8	Marginal	A few strengths and a few major weaknesses
9	Poor	Very few strengths and numerous major weaknesses
Minor Weakness:An easily addressable weakness that does not substantially lessen impact Moderate Weakness: A weakness that lessens impact Major Weakness: A weakness that severely limits impact

The final overall impact/priority score for each application is calculated by determining the average of the overall impact/priority scores given by all eligible review panel members to one decimal point and multiplying by ten. Thus, the new scores range from 10-90 in whole numbers.
For example, if we consider a final overall impact/priority score of 55, we can see that the score should reflect a "good" to "satisfactory" application that the reviewers judged to be of moderate impact, and that it has some strengths, but also one or more moderate weaknesses.
For more information about the guidance given to reviewers, download the Reviewer Orientation at http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/reviewer_orientation.ppt or visit the Enhancing Peer Review Web site at http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/index.html.