Present: Nancy Gell, Amanda Kennedy, Jerry Landau, Ben Littenberg, Liliane Savard, Connie van Eeghen (10)
1. Warm Up: Opportunities for showing up and reflecting what is important
2. Presentation by Liliane as a recruitment/new hire for a DPT program with research focus
a. Self-disclosure: not autistic
b. Autism overview
i. Double empathy problem: discomfort and barriers on both sides
c. PCORI EW awards for two projects:
i. Transition from pediatric to adult healthcare
ii. Increasing capacity for autism research
d. Explanation of the research process and outcomes for each project (used 2 websites to share)
i. Transition project: literature review
1. Careful work in identifying the different meanings of what was learned
2. Identified gaps in the research: where to go next
ii. Capacity project: two training programs
1. Identified four key learning needs?
2. Developed training collaboratively
a. Participatory research
b. Working together – creating a more welcoming space
e. Dissertation project: motor learning
i. What is known about autism
ii. Few motor learning intervention trials, esp. with more impaired children
iii. Missing important details for reproducibility
iv. Priorities in her research: age appropriate, tolerable measurement method, instruction delivery, assessment of feasibility and acceptability
v. Recruitment: feasibility, acceptability
vi. This study focused on internal vs external motivation on performance.
1. A lot of variation in response to the intervention; no effect
2. Need more support for motivation
vii. Next steps
1. Motor learning
2. First person report of motor control experiences
3. Movement signatures
4. Movement initiation: motor control and executive function
5. Intervention: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, social motor groups (in addition to motor learning)
6. Also: Gap between intention and action, plus many more issues, including design of communication designs, joint hypermobility, exercise intolerance, pain and addiction, role of physical activity, connection between autoimmune markers and neuroplasticity
3. Feedback
a. Think about the 3 ways you plan to contribute to the research mission of the organization you are applying to
i. What is your vision
ii. How does your current work support that vision
iii. Next steps to support that vision: include plan to apply for grants and to publish
b. What makes you (the investigator) helpful to the institution’s mission
i. High level review of research and publications
ii. Collaborators at the institution you would work with
iii. Funding sources
c. What’s your story, make it the thread
i. What are the three things that you want people to remember about your lead study
1. Who you are and the work you do
2. What your plan is to move your work forward
d. Assume that technology will fail; keep all the content in a single PPT
e. Let the CV cover the details; focus on what your want people to remember about you and your work
Recorded by: CvE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.