Friday, November 15, 2019

Clinical Research Oriented Workshop (CROW) Meeting: Nov 14, 2019


1.                   Warm Up: Graphic texts (like graphic novels but about academic/research topics) have some high quality representations (“Open Borders” about the science and politics on the topic of immigration)
2.                   Book chapter review: Adam’s chapter on managing migraine
a.       Kind of book:
                                                   i.      Part of a book on pain (generally, all over the body), which will have 40+ chapters
                                                 ii.      Responded to request 18 months ago
                                               iii.      Coordination and communication has not been great; sudden request for final copy in 2 weeks
                                               iv.      Audience
b.       In medical and science fields, a book chapter is not as valuable as a peer-reviewed article, unless you are the editor.  It is a boost but the not sufficient for promotion purposes.  Great for demonstrating clinical activity for regular evaluations.
c.       Audience: primary care providers, but medical students too
                                                   i.      Add definitions: aura (consider using in case study) and osmophobia, depending on the target audience
                                                 ii.      Severe headache – same as migraine, leave as is in the case presentation
d.       Overview: there is variability in treatment of migraine; practical explanations about treatment is important
e.       Feedback: well-organized and written
                                                   i.      Figure is not part of the case presentation but appears as though it should be
f.        Conclusion: don’t repeat the case, create an elevator speech, include the pearls
g.       How the problem is managed: indicate the physical mechanism affected by the different medications, where known
                                                   i.      Consider a table of treatment options, including “FDA-approved” and “off label” as well as target dose and minimum duration
                                                 ii.      Preventive therapy: add guidance for stabilizing the medication dosage
h.       Discussion: peak prevalence applied to the full span of adult life is not very informative. Consider narrowing the age range, draw attention to the impact on employment years
i.         Watch for passive voice throughout; move to active as much as possible.
3.                   Future sessions:  
a.       11/21: Mariana Wingood
b.       11/27: cancelled

Recorded by: CvE

Saturday, November 9, 2019

Marianne Burke at the North Atlantic Health Sciences Libraries Conference

Congratulations to Marianne Burke, PhD on her presentation of her thesis work at a major regional meeting last week!


Burke M, Littenberg B. Do clinical evidence sources improve patient care? A literature review of provider and independent data sources. North Atlantic Health Sciences Libraries Conference, Springfield, MA, November 8, 2019.



Friday, November 8, 2019

Fwd: Research Network Professional (RPN) subject recruitment workshop

 

November RPN Workshop

TopicPutting Participants First: Creating a Recruitment Plan For Your Participants, Not Just For Your Research

Presenter(s): Deaven Hough (UF) and Ashley Smith (BMC)

Level: Fundamental

Date: Thursday, November 21, 2019, 3:15 to 4:30 p.m.
Location: HSRF 300 Conference Room

 

https://files.constantcontact.com/1dee95d1401/cf82e412-1303-437d-b373-a1efe5dc7e54.png



HT to Gail Rose.


-Ben Littenberg

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Clinical Research Oriented Workshop (CROW) Meeting: Nov 7, 2019


Present:   Levi Bonnell, Justine Dee, Jen Oshita, Ben Littenberg, Liliane Savard, Adam Sprouse-Blum, Connie van Eeghen

1.                   Warm Up: Comps are a hypothetical study, not an actual study that will be moved forward now
2.                   How to do a comp:
a.       Identify the purpose of the study: feasibility or explanatory study or... prospective, randomized, parallel design
                                                   i.      A pilot is not a defined study; be careful about a vague description
                                                 ii.      Testing whether the intervention works as planned is a good use of a pilot study
                                               iii.      Decide what the research question is and build the case (proposal) around that; justify the choice of design
b.       Describe the intervention in simple terms, e.g. a manual, and whether it has been previously trialed
                                                   i.      Determine ahead that the manual is ready for effectiveness trial or needs more testing/refining
c.       Plan ahead for the feasibility of the proposal to the reviewer, e.g. assert that a pilot has already taken place with an effect size of x, or that a proof of concept trial took place, or that a previous trial produced a null outcome
                                                   i.      Be consistent: either a study has good enough numbers to move the field forward (use the numbers to support the grant) or not (don’t)
                                                 ii.      Be open about limitations on the population or characteristics of the study
d.       Example
                                                   i.      Determine the study: RCT
                                                 ii.      Support it with previous studies, trials, and their outcomes
                                               iii.      Use the required tools appropriately, e.g. power calculations
                                               iv.      Tell a clear story
e.       Suggestions:
                                                   i.      Clarify the intervention
                                                 ii.      Identify the hypothesis
                                               iii.      Assume that you know the effect size
                                               iv.      Simplify the story
3.                   Future sessions:  
a.       11/14: Adam

Recorded by: CvE