Present: Levi Bonnell, Justine Dee, Jen Oshita, Ben
Littenberg, Liliane Savard, Adam Sprouse-Blum, Connie van Eeghen
1.
Warm Up: Comps are a
hypothetical study, not an actual study that will be moved forward now
2.
How to do a
comp:
a. Identify the
purpose of the study: feasibility or explanatory study or... prospective,
randomized, parallel design
i.
A pilot is not a defined study; be careful about a vague
description
ii.
Testing whether the intervention works as planned is a good use of
a pilot study
iii.
Decide what the research question is and build the case (proposal)
around that; justify the choice of design
b. Describe the
intervention in simple terms, e.g. a manual, and whether it has been previously
trialed
i.
Determine ahead that the manual is ready for effectiveness trial
or needs more testing/refining
c. Plan ahead for
the feasibility of the proposal to the reviewer, e.g. assert that a pilot has
already taken place with an effect size of x, or that a proof of concept trial
took place, or that a previous trial produced a null outcome
i.
Be consistent: either a study has good enough numbers to move the
field forward (use the numbers to support the grant) or not (don’t)
ii.
Be open about limitations on the population or characteristics of
the study
d. Example
i.
Determine the study: RCT
ii.
Support it with previous studies, trials, and their outcomes
iii.
Use the required tools appropriately, e.g. power calculations
iv.
Tell a clear story
e. Suggestions:
i.
Clarify the intervention
ii.
Identify the hypothesis
iii.
Assume that you know the effect size
iv.
Simplify the story
3.
Future sessions:
a. 11/14: Adam
Recorded
by: CvE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.